Honor the Process. Planning Runs Policies thru the Spin Cycle

Honor the Process. Planning Runs Policies thru the Spin Cycle

The materials being presented by the Planning Department in support of Z-12-25 do not create a complete picture or analysis that is useful for basing your decision on this third round of change requests for these particular parcels. A good analysis of compatibility should take a broad view of relevant rules, plans and guidance, and it should reflect stakeholder input with integrity. Given the inadequacies of the materials provided to you, there is no way you can come to a rational conclusion of consistency with the comprehensive plan.

Selective Policy Emphasis and a Disregard for Neighborhood Protections

Selective Policy Emphasis and a Disregard for Neighborhood Protections

Are we just counting which policies are convenient for a project and ignoring the ones that aren’t? This isn’t about stopping growth. It’s about rejecting a project that ignores codified transition areas, disregards protections for historic neighborhoods, and offers no real public benefit for on-site affordable housing.

It’s OK to Say NO to a Developer

It’s OK to Say NO to a Developer

the proposed 30 story tower at Peace and West Streets would be triple the height of the building across the street where Publix is. It will grossly overpower the entire neighborhood. I am all for development within reason. It is ok to say no to a developer.

Why Z-12-25 (The West Street Tower) Fails Raleigh’s Vision

Why Z-12-25 (The West Street Tower) Fails Raleigh’s Vision

Raleigh needs growth, but growth must be responsible. The 2030CP and ETOD establish a framework where context, transitions, and neighborhood protection guide how and where height happens. Z-12-25 proposes 240-360 foot towers just steps from a historic neighborhood. This is inconsistent with adopted plans, sets a dangerous precedent, and undermines Raleigh’s planning tools.