Stormie Forte : District D (running At-Large)

Rising Cost of Living

The cost of gas, food and housing in Raleigh is rising much faster than incomes, forcing families with service wages and fixed incomes out of Raleigh. Since 2019, Council has raised Raleigh taxes by 22% while increasing Council pay and benefits 82%. [1] Forte did NOT vote for the Parks Bond, so she is only responsible for half of the Property Tax increase. But, she is fully responsible for the Service Fee increases and she did vote to increase Council’s pay.

In one of the most undemocratic moves made by City Council, in addition to moving the October 2021 election to November 2022 and giving themselves an extra year in office, all done with no public input and no public vote, they also changed the format of all future elections to no longer allow a run-off. The top vote-getter wins, no matter what their percentage of the vote is. This favors incumbents. [4]
In her application to be appointed to the open District D Council Seat in 2020, Forte described herself as someone who would provide strategic guidance, public relations, advocacy and other services to the constituents of District D. [26] But, when one of Forte’s constituents wanted to discuss a concern with her, the constituent was told Forte had no appointments for eleven weeks!

In her application to be appointed to the open District D City Council seat in 2020, Forte pledged to make it a top priority to increase Raleigh’s supply of affordable housing. [26] Raleigh is rapidly losing – not gaining – affordable rental housing. Council’s total Affordable Housing production, from all funding sources including the $80M Bond, is fewer than 600 units / year. [33] Despite losing more than 4,000 affordable units each year, Council policies and rezoning votes overwhelmingly produce high-profit, market rate and luxury units favored by developers.[5]
Forte changed Raleigh’s Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) rules to promote profitable short-term rentals over affordable long-term rentals.[6]

Since 2019, Forte has accepted ???? dollars in campaign donations from wealthy developers [8] while approving a lucrative developer tax break program and millions of dollars of high-rise upzonings for her developer donors. [9] In return for her upzoning largesse, she has negotiated zero affordable housing units benefitting the rest of Raleigh. [10] NOTE- We would like to be able to tell you how much money Forte has accepted in donations from developers. But, she has so far neglected to file a required campaign finance report with the Board of Elections that was due on July 29, 2022.
Unlike truly progressive cities, Forte’s Missing Middle rules actually hurt modest income families two ways: The rules don’t require that added infill density include affordable or accessible units. Instead, her rules promote developer-friendly, maximum-profit units that drive up the cost of all housing and drive modest income families out of town. [11]
Forte effectively eliminated residential zoning throughout Raleigh by allowing commercial businesses to operate in residentially zoned neighborhoods. [12]
Forte has increased density allowances in neighborhoods without any regard for neighborhood character or the environment. [13]

Forte has yet to apologize for her secret vote to extend her own term in office, even after it was criticized by the N&O, State Senators and even Governor Cooper, and was called “deplorable” by clean government experts. [14]
Forte has yet to acknowledge that her Council redistricting vote disproportionately reduced the voting power of minority voters, even after she was told by multiple voting rights experts that the city’s process was flawed, and the results were biased against minority voters. [15]
We are not sure if Forte has taken campaign cash from Anti-LGBTQ+ bigot John Kane or not. As noted above, she has neglected to file a required Campaign Finance Report. [30]

Raleigh’s adopted 2021 Community Climate Action Plan (CCAP) has no teeth and no Council Champions: The CCAP acknowledges that the plan has no enforcement powers for reducing 98% of Raleigh’s GHG emissions. The Plan also acknowledges it has no metrics for measuring progress toward Carbon Reduction Goals.[27] No one on Council has stepped forward to champion significant Climate Protection action.
Raleigh’s Climate Plan says current growth hurts vulnerable populations most: Raleigh’s adopted Community Climate Action Plan (CCAP) says growth and development under this Council is “increasing the social vulnerability of low-income individuals and communities of color … Many socially vulnerable populations lack access to affordable housing, jobs, and other resources and services.” [27]
In the most important rezoning cases, Council undermines CCAP Equity Goals: Council voted unanimously for the Downtown South rezoning despite the fact that the Planning Commission said the rezoning made a mockery of Raleigh’s Equity Mission Statement referenced in the CCAP. [31]
In the most important rezoning cases, Council makes a mockery of Raleigh’s Climate Protection Goals: Council approved the Azalea Falls rezoning despite overwhelming evidence that it violated virtually every environmental protection, carbon reduction, sustainable growth and equity principle contained in the CCAP. [32]