Upcoming Raleigh Events

CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

May 2024 Call for Petition Signatures

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

Read up on our latest news…

Councilor Silver Must Recuse!

Councilor Silver Must Recuse!

It would be reasonable for you to believe that once Silver was elected to City Council in November 2024, just one year after being paid to represent the West St property owner, he would feel obligated to recuse himself from any future City Council actions related to this property. But, Silver has stated publicly that he has no intention of recusing himself from voting on this rezoning case when it comes before the City Council.

Don’t let the State Take Over Raleigh’s Local Zoning Decisions

Don’t let the State Take Over Raleigh’s Local Zoning Decisions

HB 765 is currently under consideration at the NC General Assembly. If passed, the bill would eliminate any local control over zoning. HB 765 was written by the Homebuilders Association and creates statewide mandates, eviscerates conditional zoning, and bars council from considering residents’ opinions. Please ask your representatives to OPPOSE HB 765

Why rezoning and building more alone will not fix affordability

Why rezoning and building more alone will not fix affordability

Rezoning and adding more housing alone will not solve Raleigh’s affordability challenges. To make meaningful progress rapidly, we need a comprehensive strategy that includes building a diversity of unit types and price points, expanding Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing (NOAH), balancing individual ownership and institutional investment, and incentivizing developers to ensure rezoned projects get built.

Noise Terrorism

Noise Terrorism

There needs to be a moratorium on amplified sound from Raleigh businesses until you can come up with a solution to this never ending citywide problem.

Trust and Transparency

Trust and Transparency

The 2030 Comp Plan was planning for a population of 600,000 when it was envisioned. We are not close to that. Mitchell Silver was hired to see the Comp Plan and UDO completed. Mitchell said that this would streamline development and get rid of “spot” zoning. Councilor Silver, how many times did you say, “just follow the plan”?

Missing the Mark, Missing the People, and Missing the Point

Missing the Mark, Missing the People, and Missing the Point

The City didn’t rezone these areas the proper way. Instead, they used a procedural sleight-of- hand, labeling it a “text change” to the Unified Development Ordinance. This way, they bypassed the normal legal requirements—like directly notifying affected residents via mail and holding a proper legislative hearing. You probably didn’t hear about this change. That’s not a coincidence. Only five people spoke at the public hearing. In a city of nearly half a million residents, that’s not engagement. That’s evasion.

Speaking to Save Raleigh’s Trees

Speaking to Save Raleigh’s Trees

Studies show that areas with fewer trees and more pavement have hotter and more polluted air than areas with trees. And studies show that downtowns and low-income areas tend to have fewer trees than wealthier areas. This is true in Raleigh as well.
n the 1990s and early 2000s, the City was continually planting trees. But now it seems that we are cutting down more trees than we plant, especially in downtown and lower-income areas.

Raleigh approves over 98% of Zoning Requests – BUILD THEM!

Raleigh approves over 98% of Zoning Requests – BUILD THEM!

The facts show that of the 303 zoning applications submitted and resolved from 2020 to today, only 5 have been denied including the previous version of the 30-story tower. 298 have been approved. An approval rate over 98.3%.
In the same time council has approved cases for over 110,000 housing units. What is clear is that Raleigh does not suffer from a lack of entitlement to build housing. You approved over 98% of requests, over 110,000 units. BUILD THEM!

City Council Meetings May 13, 2025

City Council Meetings May 13, 2025

HIGHLIGHTS Shared results of Social City Assessment study and Traffic and Safety Study in Glenwood South. The Social City Assessment consultant seemed to be biased toward businesses rather than residents. These issues will be discussed further in May 27 meeting of...

West St Tower Violates Raleigh Downtown Plan

West St Tower Violates Raleigh Downtown Plan

The Downtown Plan specifically notes the recommendation that the North End of downtown would have less large-scale development in contrast to the large-scale redevelopment contemplated on the South End of downtown, the vision for the North End fills the gaps between existing assets to create a complete neighborhood. Furthermore, the plan shows appropriate residential development for the West Street site at 7 and 8 stories.

West St Tower Violates Equitable Transit Development

West St Tower Violates Equitable Transit Development

Key Strategies of Equitable Transit Oriented Development allow for relatively higher densities in mixed-use areas near BRT stations. The density and building height of new developments should respect the existing neighborhood contexts. Transition building height and bulk downward from the station to connect with adjacent, lower density districts and neighborhoods.

RDU Plans to close Lake Crabtree County Park

RDU Plans to close Lake Crabtree County Park

Per an attorney for TORC (Triangle Off Road Cyclists), RDU does NOT have to develop Lake Crabtree County Park (LCCP). Wake County Commissioners do have the ability to step in. Please consider using this and other information to speak at the following upcoming public meetings in May (or to submit a written comment)

West St Tower violates Capital Blvd Corridor Study

West St Tower violates Capital Blvd Corridor Study

The Capital Boulevard Corridor Study (CBCS) is an area plan companion to the Comprehensive Plan. The CBCS specifies the Historic Glenwood/Brooklyn Neighborhood (HGBN) and recommends heights in the study area ranging from three stories at the neighborhood edge, up to twelve stories in areas well separated from neighborhoods. Councilor Silver campaigned on keeping development consistent with our Plans.

West St Tower Proposal Violates the Comprehensive Plan

West St Tower Proposal Violates the Comprehensive Plan

The tower proposal violates 4 city plans, 47 city policies and 2 city tables. One ex. is Policy LU 8.3 Conserving, Enhancing, and Revitalizing Neighborhoods: Recognize the importance of balancing the need to increase the housing supply and expand neighborhood commerce with the parallel need to protect neighborhood character, preserve historic resources, and restore the environment.

Peace/West St Neighborhood meeting – All Stand!

Peace/West St Neighborhood meeting – All Stand!

This rezoning would set a dangerous precedent that would affect ALL neighborhoods. It violates height guidance, 4 plans, 47 policies, and 2 tables. There is not one single city policy or plan that supports more than 12 stories at this location.

Flawed development regulations in Frequent Transit Areas

Flawed development regulations in Frequent Transit Areas

When a developer desires to build a high-density development inside an FTA (Frequent Transit Area), no rezoning for higher density is required – the City has already done the upzoning by fiat, no rezoning request required.